UCSB | The Gevirtz School Graudate School of Education. Click here to go to the home page.


The Gevirtz School

Graduate School of Education
University of California, Santa Barbara

  • About Gevirtz School
    • Dean Conoley's Message
    • Mission & History
    • Don & Marilyn Gevirtz
    • Faculty
    • Staff
    • Student Association
    • Employment
    • Alumni News
    • GGSE Alumni Assoc
    • News & Press
  • Graduate Studies
    • Dept Counseling,
      Clinical & Sch Psych
    • Dept of Education
    • Teacher Education Prog
    • Joint Doc Ed Leadership
    • Credentials
    • Pre-Professional
    • Student Affairs
    • Financial Support
  • Undergraduate Studies
    • Ed & Applied Psy Minor
    • Science Math Initiative
    • Pre-Professional
    • Student Affairs
    • Requirements
    • Announcements
    • Forms
  • Prospective Students
    • What Gevirtz Offers - FAQ
    • Credentials
    • Students Services
    • Financial Support
    • Housing
    • Living in Santa Barbara
    • Deadlines
  • Faculty/Research
    • Faculty
    • Koegel Autism Center
    • Asperger Research
    • Hosford Clinic
    • Psych Assessment Center
    • Teaching & Technology
    • Research Centers
    • Research Office
    • Research Highlights
    • Research Interests
  • Donors & Partners
    • Support Gevirtz
    • Support Autism Center
    • Dean's Council
    • Community Relations
    • GGSE Alumni Assoc
    • Our New Building

 

Department of Education

 

Office Number:
  Education 3262

Phone Number:
  (805) 893-3102

E-mail:
  education.ucsb.edu copeland



Willis Copeland

Professor, Ph.D. (University of Notre Dame)

Emphasis:
Teaching & Learning

Research Interests:
Teacher cognition; Teacher education; Application of technology to educational purposes

Biography:
I wonder about teachers and why they teach the way they do. Much of the history of educational research is characterized by researchers developing new methods of teaching and then recommending these for teacher use. These researchers continue to assume that teachers will simply accept and implement their recommendations and then are frustrated when teachers don't. Change/improvement in classrooms appears to many researchers to be frustrated by teachers, and their unwillingness to change.

I believe that researchers who hold this view miss an important point. We are now coming to realize that much of this previous research and development work was done without appropriate appreciation of what the task of teaching involves. Classrooms are incredibly complicated workplaces. For example, among all the professions, only air traffic controllers rival teachers in the number of interpersonal communications required in a typical day's work. The diversity that characterizes the student population, the continually shifting demands to cover different content, the need to attend to multiple modes of learning, and the shear number of "clients" who demand immediate and continuing attention all impinge on the teacher's effort to establish a functioning learning environment.

My research is aimed at discovering how teachers understand their work, how and why they come to teach as they do, and how they can be helped to improve their own teaching. I am convinced of the importance of carefully considering the context within which teachers work before any effort is made to improve that work. I believe that teachers' own thoughts about their work -- how they make meaning of that they do -- offer potentially fruitful insights into the nature of the classroom context. I am working to uncover the implicit but important understandings that good teachers depend upon and also to discern the processes of professional development by which good teachers develop these understandings. My coming to this present research focus focus has, itself, been an evolution, from my time as a junior high school history teacher and coach, through Notre Dame and my work as a young professor in the Teacher Education Program here at UCSB, to my work in recent years on understanding the workings of classrooms and on applications of technology to educational purposes. This evolution is continuing, influenced greatly by the graduate students with whom I work. I hope it will contribute to a genuine improvement in teaching based on a clearer understanding of the tasks teachers face, the ways they think about them and how they strive to improve their own work.

Recent Publications:
Copeland, W. Potentials for technology in the pursuit of knowledge. The World of Technology: Computers in Education, Fall, pp. L1-L4. Fresno Unified School District. 1998. [Reprint ]

Copeland, W. & D’Emidio-Caston, M. Indicators of development of practical theory in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(5), 513-534. 1998. [Journal Article]

Copeland, W. & Decker, D.L. Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(5), 467-481. 1996. [Journal Article]

Copeland, W. & Shinkle, J. (Eds.). Access to science center education. Santa Barbara, CA: California Aquatic Science Educational Consortium. 1996. [Edited Book]

Shavelson, R., Copeland, W., Baxter, G., Decker, L., & Ruiz-Primo, M.A. Inservice education models: Enhancing science teaching. In S. Fitzsimmons & I. Weiss (Eds.), Pre-college teacher enhancement in science and mathematics: Status, issues and problems. Washington,DC: National Science Foundation. 1994. [Book Chapter]

Affiliations:
American Educational Research Association

School-wide Links

  • Courses
  • Apply
  • Computing
  • Contact
Copyright © 2005 The Regents of the University of California, All Rights Reserved
The Gevirtz School, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara CA 93106-9490
Last Modified •